I shall share with all of you whatever little I know about the Constitution Review.
It seems UKKCA appointed a committee to review the bylaws of its constitution. The said committee’s findings with suggestions/recommendations were submitted in the recent National Council meeting by one gentleman (probably the head of the committee). Even though he has no legal background, he studied the constitution as good as he could and presented his views in his Koodara Yogam before it was submitted in the National Council.
The major recommendations were, (1) reducing the minimum distance between the units to 20 miles, (2) giving voting rights to youth who are 18 years of age and above, (3) fixing 25 years as the minimum age to become UKKCA Executive Member.
Like our Legislative Assembly back home, UKKCA National Council postponed its decision and left the matter to the next Executive Committee which will be elected in January (?). The Committee’s head (back home he was the leader of an ആളില്ല്ലാ പാര്ട്ടി) tore the papers and put it in the bin. His ADCs claim that it was only a gimmick and the real papers are still with him. Thank God members were all wearing pants and therefore they could not pull down the opponent’s Mundu
Lady members of National Council, beware. You should attend the National Council meetings wearing Jeans and top!
Now you all know why the report of the proceedings of National Council are kept as a guarded secret. Whatever that happens there is shameful and they don’t want us to know about it!
Ordinary members of the U.K. Knanaya Community would like to know why a committee was appointed to review the by-laws and what the outcome was. Delaying, postponement and procrastination are no solution. Unless leaders with commitment are elected, the style of function of the next EC will be the same.
If any serious Constitution Review is planned, a committee with at least a few persons with legal background (there are such people in our community) should be appointed and suggestions from member units and ordinary members should be invited. That is if they are serious and sincere about it.
Lessons for we, the members of UKKCA are - think twice before casting votes. Is the candidate capable of discussing a serious matter? Can he/she speak and behave properly in public? Has he/she any vision for the future of the organization and the community? Please don’t elect people who are problematic at home and in the unit.
We need a strong organisation for the sake of our next generation.
It seems UKKCA appointed a committee to review the bylaws of its constitution. The said committee’s findings with suggestions/recommendations were submitted in the recent National Council meeting by one gentleman (probably the head of the committee). Even though he has no legal background, he studied the constitution as good as he could and presented his views in his Koodara Yogam before it was submitted in the National Council.
The major recommendations were, (1) reducing the minimum distance between the units to 20 miles, (2) giving voting rights to youth who are 18 years of age and above, (3) fixing 25 years as the minimum age to become UKKCA Executive Member.
Like our Legislative Assembly back home, UKKCA National Council postponed its decision and left the matter to the next Executive Committee which will be elected in January (?). The Committee’s head (back home he was the leader of an ആളില്ല്ലാ പാര്ട്ടി) tore the papers and put it in the bin. His ADCs claim that it was only a gimmick and the real papers are still with him. Thank God members were all wearing pants and therefore they could not pull down the opponent’s Mundu
Lady members of National Council, beware. You should attend the National Council meetings wearing Jeans and top!
Now you all know why the report of the proceedings of National Council are kept as a guarded secret. Whatever that happens there is shameful and they don’t want us to know about it!
Ordinary members of the U.K. Knanaya Community would like to know why a committee was appointed to review the by-laws and what the outcome was. Delaying, postponement and procrastination are no solution. Unless leaders with commitment are elected, the style of function of the next EC will be the same.
If any serious Constitution Review is planned, a committee with at least a few persons with legal background (there are such people in our community) should be appointed and suggestions from member units and ordinary members should be invited. That is if they are serious and sincere about it.
Lessons for we, the members of UKKCA are - think twice before casting votes. Is the candidate capable of discussing a serious matter? Can he/she speak and behave properly in public? Has he/she any vision for the future of the organization and the community? Please don’t elect people who are problematic at home and in the unit.
We need a strong organisation for the sake of our next generation.
Absolutely true. It is shameful to all the UKKCA National council members
ReplyDeletekm
Well done...
ReplyDeleteIt is a fact that people are voting and electing the members to National committee who are not capable to lead such an organisation..which lead to a crisis where it ended up now.
these 2 ladies stand for national committee,they can"t do nothing.let them prove something for their own community in mkca.by saji mathew...
ReplyDelete